The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and report in the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is a bar chart revealing the number of research students from both genders enrolled in six subjects - Linguistics, Psychology, Natural Science, Engineering, Programming and Mathematics in 2011 at a US university.
It is evident that Natural Science and Psycholoy had highest popularity by both genders among all subjects. The former one had identical number of male and female students, with each reached 200, whereas the same number of boys and 20 less girls enrolled in Psychology. Meanwhile, Maths, Programming and Engineering witnessed significant disparities among males and females. Having 200 males participating in Maths research, over four times less females than males studied in the same subject. Furthermore, a similar pattern can also be seen in Engineering and a Programming, which had males outnumbered females about 2 to 1.
The only subject having more females than males was Linguistics, with about 110 girls and 80 boys studied respectively. It is also interesting to note that this subject had the least total number of students amongst all subjects.
Overall, males dominated in most of the subjects listed except Linguistics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...dent that Natural Science and Psycholoy had highest popularity by both genders among all su...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun girls is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... whereas the same number of boys and 20 less girls enrolled in Psychology. Meanwhile...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49162011173 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05231646499 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631284916201 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8084883168 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233369880179 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933682859904 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635875344624 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144421369123 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051651803981 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.