The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the electricity produced from all the origins and reusable in two countries Germany and France in 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that three different types of sources value given in percentages. While electricity generation is shown in Billion kWh. Germany generated more electricity compare to France. For this generation, it used three types of sources like conventional thermal, Renewables and Nuclear.
To start with, conventional thermal it used 59.6% in Germany, but it had a drastic fall to 10.3% in France. In contrast, portion of Nuclear it increased rapidly from 23.0% to 76.0% for Germany to France. Renewables percentages are in between 13 to 18 for both countries.
In Germany renewables are Biomass and wind cover 39.3% and 36.9% respectively. While in France only Hydroelectric only occupied 80.5%. As well, as solar value it decreased slowly from 6.1% to 0.9% for Germany to France. Finally geothermal remained constant for both the countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of sources value given in percentages. While electricity generation is shown in Bill...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Billion'.
Suggestion: A Billion
...hile electricity generation is shown in Billion kWh. Germany generated more electricity...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ind cover 39.3% and 36.9% respectively. While in France only Hydroelectric only occup...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...rom 6.1% to 0.9% for Germany to France. Finally geothermal remained constant for both t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, well, while, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3949044586 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92615374777 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5755447725 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2727272727 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218854891808 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775120772925 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801255336744 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147347504803 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089561577949 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.