The pie charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
The given pie charts illustrate the differences between the year 2004 and 2009 about the proportion of people using five different means of transport to travel to one university.
Overall, out of five categories, while individuals who use cars and buses for their travel were the majority, the proportions of people going by train and foot were smallest. Additionally, there are considerable gaps between the percentage of people using cars and buses in two surveyed years.
Regarding the year 2004, traveling by cars whose figure accounted for 51% was the main way to arrive to the university. Additionally, that figure was followed by approximately one-third of the percentage of bus travelers. By contrast, the figures for train and walking which were 3% and 4% respectively were considered the smallest.
Going to the year 2009, a significant decrease by roughly a half was witnessed in the proportion of people using cars. Consequently, the figure for cars users was overtaken by that for bus users which increase significantly to 46% over the 5-year period. Moreover, out of the three remaining types of transport, the percentage of people using trains and walking remained steady, whereas the figures for bicycle grew rapidly from 9% to 16% during the examined period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, regarding, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24757281553 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9298881394 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7370368451 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19565981295 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853755213428 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962046195682 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143336407596 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111610520742 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.