The plan below show the public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summaries the main information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible.
The following blueprint illustrates the Grange park when it initially inaugurated in 1920 and same park after refurbishment. The park have entrance in both sides one in Eldon street and other in Arnold Avenue.
As an overall trend since 1920 park had more open spaces and garden but, stage in one side for musician. But currently park have underground parking and amphitheater for concerts. apart from that have children play ground and cafe.
In century ago when park was first opened for public mostly meant for outdoor activities and exercises. In parks seating and rose garden were present all around the park but currently seats arrange around central rose garden in place of fountain. Another replacement made in musician stage to amphitheater for conterts.
However, on other side cafe and children play constructed by destruction of pond for water plants in one corner. While other corner glass house removed and water feature build. The most striking difference is underground car parking which was absent in 1920 model.
nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than work for company or organisation. Why this is the case? What could be disadvantages for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Apart
... parking and amphitheater for concerts. apart from that have children play ground and...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
...arking which was absent in 1920 model. nowadays many people choose to be self-employed,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19791666667 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70600861767 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4641089104 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2857142857 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7142857143 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196137111964 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065737001428 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711535719299 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109801978859 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683391899364 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.