The plans above show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today . Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
The two plans provide information about Grange park initially before renovation in 1920 and it's present period after reconstruction. Overall, it was seen that some of the facilities has been compressed or replaced with a new ones.
Grange park in 1920 have four seats scattered around the regions, two to the east, one in the west and the last one to the extreme North. The rose gardens were in Grange park in 1920, two to the northern part and one towards the South.moving towards the east it has stage for musicians to play and sing, in addition, the park has a fountain at its centre and it also has a glasshouse close to the western south.
After the renovation in today's time , the two seats and the stage for musicians has been replaced with amphi theatre for concerts, more so, the four seats are now gathered together to rose garden which against where fountain was situated. The cafe has taken the place of rose gardens in the northern part while water features took the place of glasshouse after reconstruction. The pond at the extreme North now occupied children's play area. The park still maintain the same entrance to the two street while Eldon street in today's time now has entrance to underground car park
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two plans provide information about Grange park initially before renovation ...
^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...construction. Overall, it was seen that some of the facilities has been compressed or repla...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
... been compressed or replaced with a new ones. Grange park in 1920 have four seats ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Grange) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...ed or replaced with a new ones. Grange park in 1920 have four seats scattered arou...
^^^^
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th a new ones. Grange park in 1920 have four seats scattered around the regions,...
^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th. After the renovation in todays time , the two seats and the stage for musicia...
^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...North now occupied childrens play area. The park still maintain the same entrance t...
^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tain the same entrance to the two street while Eldon street in todays time now ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71028037383 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50353562858 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2432946746 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154919604007 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661129269998 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566698468526 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107300518468 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00374944441639 0.0819641961636 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.