The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps outline the current design of a university’s sports complex together with some predictions of its new layout after the upcoming refurbishment.
Overall, a comparison between the two maps reveals a shift of the sports center from a simply designed area into a modern landscape.
Looking at the maps, it can be recognized that the center is anticipated to undergo notable changes with some new facilities as well as recreational services. First, the two outdoor courts are planned to be demolished, with the extension of the sports center overtaking the initial courts. On the west flank of the center, the leisure pool will be erected, with a small entrance located to the south of it. Following the center’s expansion, the gym is predicted to be doubled in size, located next to two new dance studios and to the north of the new sports hall. Moreover, two new changing rooms are going to be constructed in the southwest and southeast corners of the center, all of which being adjacent to the sports shop and a cafeteria close to the main entrance. The facilities in the middle of the map, namely the pool, the seating and the former changing room, are predicted to experience no upgrade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The maps outline the current design of a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...nce studios and to the north of the new sports hall. Moreover, two new changing rooms ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88780487805 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78174554352 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3793099788 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092684921832 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441424897699 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319649456513 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755265006224 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271615220034 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.