The two diagrams compare the plan in the sports centre of university after reconstruction.
It can be clearly seen that outdoor courts will be dismantled and the sports centre will expand more westerly and easterly. Overall, the present facilities will not change except the gym room will see a growing.
Looking precisely to the map, building a wast leisure pool is one of the westerly expansion ideas for the centre in addition to building a changing room at the south corner of the complex and a sports shop right next to it. The entrance will not see any changes (as well as the old changing room, seating and reception) and will be still from the south of the centre.
It is also clear about the easterly development that a big sports hall will be added to the complex just behind the seating. In addition, there will be a cafe and a changing room locating beside each other just in front, after entering the centre and turning right. Finally, there is an idea about building two dancing studios at the end of the eastern side of the complex.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, look, so, still, well, as for, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64171122995 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40945737834 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2024175268 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15167387763 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784224305243 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580284438681 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118809736516 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568633199285 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.