The maps compare the layout of a public park called Grane in its opening year 1920 and as it is now.
It is clear that apart from the rose garden in the Northwest and the two entrances, the rest of the park’s features has been completely replaced.
Both in the two maps, visitors can access Grane park either through the entrance on the Arnold Avenue side or the one on the Eldon street side. Also, a new underground parking area has been built, which can be approached through the entrance on the East side. Of the three rose garderns in 1920, only the garden on the Northwest remains unchanged.
Major transformations can be seen in other features. Firstly, in the middle of the park, a large rose garden has been grown on the place where the fountain was previously placed. In addition to this, seats were organized around four sides of the garden instead of being allocated at different corners of the park. Moreover, major changes include the conversion of the musicians’ stage into an amphitheatre with greater capacity, the replacement of the glass house by the water feature, and the development of a playground for children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Grane) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...the two maps, visitors can access Grane park either through the entrance on the Arno...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79187817259 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62532260723 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7100397486 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13978226614 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583885263522 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046075893704 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953670159123 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366281177835 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.