The given maps provide information about the transformation that has taken place on the Grange Park from 1920 till date.
Overall, it can be seen that the public park has experienced considerable changes in the architectural structures and a new additional car park. Furthermore, the size and location of the park remained unchanged.
In 1920, a fountain was located in the centre of the park between the two entrances form Arnold Avenue on the north and Eldon Street on the south the park. There was a stage for musicians on the west side which was surrounded by rose gardens and seating areas on the north-west and south-west of the park while on the eastern part of the park, there was a pond for water plant on the northeast and a glasshouse on the southeastern part of the park.
Currently, the changes include replacement of the fountain with a rose garden surrounded with seats in the middle of the park, in addition, an amphitheatre for concerts has been constructed in the place of the stage for musicians on the west while maintaining the rose garden on the north-west of the park. However, on the other side, construction of children's play area and cafe have replaced the pond and rose garden respectively on the northeast of the park while the rectangular glasshouse has been replaced by a water feature. Lastly, the most significant change is the inclusion of an underground parking lot with its entrance on the southeastern part of the park.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the park remained unchanged. In 1920, a fountain was located in the centre of ...
^^
Line 7, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e on the southeastern part of the park.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89009619217 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5169007193 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.875 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.25 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242082882242 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131428238031 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422581841935 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165705533174 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389174639118 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.