The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two plan illustrates the changes happened to the community park since it started operating in 1920 to till today.
From both plans it’s clearly visible that, there are major changes have taken place in Grange Park since it started operating. It can also be understandable that whatever modifications have been carried out are related to modern requirements such as Amphitheatre, café, underground car park.
First of all, we can see there is no change in the entrance in both the plans that is park is having two entrance, which are opposite to each other. In addition to this the rose garden at the left side of the entrance at Arnold Avenue has been removed and replaced by a café. Due to this number of rose gardens are drastically reduced from three number in 1920 to only one on present day. Furthermore the glass house has been replaced by water feature at right bottom corner of the park.
Apart from this we can witness there is a major change in the facility given to music lover’s, such as stage of musicians has been completely replace by modern facility like amphitheater’s which can be utilized to arrange concerts. Apart from this, park has been modified with respect to seating arrangements. Previously seats where located at the boundary of the park, but now every seating facilities are shifted to center of the park.
To sum it up, the Grange Park has just got upgraded to Modern Park with lot of modifications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ber in 1920 to only one on present day. Furthermore the glass house has been replaced by wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
... stage of musicians has been completely replace by modern facility like amphitheater’s ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, apart from, in addition, such as, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81526104418 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68672597707 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570281124498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7767556538 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178157062125 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789626573731 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531539717372 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114679699491 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296997031783 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.