Both maps illustrate the layout of public park in two different years, 1920 and 2019. At first glance, we can see that several changes have made during 79 years.
In a detail, changes were done in some areas. The first is in the west side, where previously was the place of Stage for Musicians. In 2019, the building has been demolished and as a replacement, an Amphitheater for Concerts has been built. After that, we can see that Pond for Water Plants in 1920 does not exist anymore in 2019. As a consequence, there is a building of Children's Play Area in that location. Furthermore, Glass House has been replaced by Water Feature in the southwestern side. Besides that, there were only two entrances in 1920, in the north side and in the south side. But today, visitors can enter the Grange Park through underground entrance, since the Entrance Underground Car Park has been built.
The last yet most significant change can be seen in the arrangement of Fountain, Rose Garden, and Seats. Formerly, Fountain was located in the center of Grange Park, and there were three Rose Gardens found in the Park. In addition, seats were located near the south and north entrance, and near the southwestern and northwestern Rose Gardens. Today, we spot that Rose Garden is only one, located in the former area of Fountain, because it is no longer exist in today's Grange Park. Furthermore, seats are now encircling the Rose Garden. And also, we can spot that the northeastern Rose Garden is now replaced by a Cafe.
In conclusion, during a 79-year period, the Grange Park is almost entirely renovated. Major changes are found in the layout of Rose Garden, Fountain, and Seats.
Wow i'm so surprised why i
Wow i'm so surprised why i score so low in the Map Task..Any comments guys? Thank you...God bless you
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... side, where previously was the place of Stage for Musicians. In 2019, the buildi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58587091616 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506944444444 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6860249467 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3333333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.09268292683 367% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143215171989 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453421150628 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535971524709 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087507778076 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250315902533 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.