Some people think that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs ( example charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for young children)
Nowadays, some people think that unpaid congregation services can become a important part of high school lesson. I agree that educators should design required community services for their high school students with any payment. This essay will support this argument.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of children should have unpaid community services for high school. First, some people think that government education system for unpaid community services are believed to equalize educational opportunities among young adolescents in the future regardless of their background. This community support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall communication skills for young children but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority when facing society and discovering their own talents, which eventually promotes a friendly and active society. Second, unpaid community services would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once the high school have unpaid community services, and this is a compulsory part. First, offering all people free community services would likely correspond with a tremendous financial trains on a country. Generating no income from school activities and fees, high school could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas, such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, when community services become a compulsory part in high school, this means that children will have more homework, and even an overload schedule. Besides, sports activities do not suit for everyone, so that would tempt many young people including those who are not passion for sports or show no interest in charity pursuit, thereby adding great burdens for high school admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable activities paths. It, instead, would be a more services viable option of the resources were focused on supporting passionate people, and the school must arrange a certain time.
In conclusion, although there are some disadvantages it seems to me that we should design more unpaid obligatory community programs for high school students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...unpaid congregation services can become a important part of high school lesson. I...
^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'train'?
Suggestion: train
... correspond with a tremendous financial trains on a country. Generating no income from...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65535248042 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78295669093 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574412532637 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9951225006 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.4 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455931159284 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160776284971 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102028890855 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290468755999 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221656596436 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.