The graph below show the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph give information about the number of enquiries sent to the Tourist Information Office in a particular city through three means of communication between January and June of the year 2011.
According to the chart, during the period in 2011 the number of inquiries in January to June dramatically increased, while letter and email saw a significant decline. However, we can see clear more if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the line graph in January 2012, the Tourist Information Office received 900 and by letter and email approximately 800 enquiries. Meanwhile, the person enquiries about 400. During the following quarter, telephonic enquiries about 1600 and highest second after made by person.
From March to June, the number of enquiries received about 609 and 800 made by person and by letter. Meanwhile, made by letter had the significantly decreased when from 800 to 400 enquiries in January to Jun.By contrast, the number of enquiries made by person and telephone were highest among three areas ( 1900 and 1600)
All in all, there are a wide differences in enquiries received by Tourists Information Office between three areas which illustrated in this chart. These differences may be result of the number of areas required in a certain country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
... 800 to 400 enquiries in January to Jun.By contrast, the number of enquiries made ...
^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...telephone were highest among three areas 1900 and 1600 All in all, there are a w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79804388032 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509615384615 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.9256274803 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221579569626 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946348199757 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825188920543 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138506582122 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778206177417 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.