The line graph gives information about how many enquiries was tourist information Office recieve from january to june in 2011.
It is clear that there were upward trends in the figures for enquiries recieved in person and by telephone, while the number of enquiries recieved by letter and email witnessed a downward trend. Overall, the figure for enquiries asked face to face recorded a significant change over the given period.
In january, the enquiries that was asked face to face was the most popular, with figure well over 800, compared to just under 800 enquiries sent by letter/ email and 400 enquiries asked by telephone. The figure for telephone decreased slightly by 100 in february but rised to 1000 in march. In addition, the figure for in person saw an increase of almost 200, whereas that for letter/ email declined moderately.
Over the next three months, the figure for person grown dramatically by almost 1100 and reached its peak at more over 1800 in june. Besides, the number of enquiries remained stable over the next month before rising to 1600 by june. By contrast, after a gradual decrease in the next two months, the figure for letter/ email stayed unchanged at below 400.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w many enquiries was tourist information Office recieve from january to june in 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79807692308 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37371500585 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533653846154 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0167508416 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.888888889 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152275616084 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739566225884 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648156273489 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116548777005 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671010100452 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.