It is evident that people are generating more waste these days. There are reasons that lie beneath the issue and this essay will discuss them, and also will discuss some of the solutions that governments could do to resolve it.
It is a fact that the amount of garbage that people produce these days has increased rapidly compared to the past. The main reason is due to the significant growth of the world population in the past few years. It is undeniable that waste production will automatically increase when the world population grows, as every individual will surely generate some wastages. Another reason is that people's lifestyle has changed these days and they have adopted a throwaway habit. It is noticed that people prefer to use plastic bags or plastic mineral bottles rather than to bring their own permanent bags or bottles. Many people do not realise that plastic wastages need around one hundred years to be decomposed. People nowadays change their electronic gadgets and appliances more frequently than ever before. This kind of living has seriously impacted the amount of rubbish that is produced each day.
There are some considerable solutions that governments could do in order to resolve the issue. Firstly, governments should make a clear regulation about limiting the usage of plastic bags and bottles. For example, governments could give tax incentives to retailers who reduce the usage of plastic bags and replace them with recyclable paper bags. Secondly, they could also make campaigns to the society about the negative effects of plastic bags and bottles to the environment. Campaigns could be made in the form of posters, short video clip or even a documentary film which can be easily accessed by the public. Furthermore, people have to be more careful about waste dumping and taking responsibility for waste recycling. By considering to these soluble solutions, it is hoped that the garbage production will decline in the future.
In conclusion, it is true that nowadays people are producing more garbage than ever before. It is mainly due to the significant growth of the population, the usage of plastic materials and people's lifestyle. Some of the solutions that governments could do would be by setting clear regulations and making awareness campaigns to the society while people have to participate in waste recycling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ill discuss them, and also will discuss some of the solutions that governments could do to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wastages. Another reason is that peoples lifestyle has changed these days and the...
^^
Line 3, column 899, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of rubbish that is produced each day. There are some considerable solutions th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...lastic materials and peoples lifestyle. Some of the solutions that governments could do wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.48453608247 254% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 4.92783505155 304% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 3.03092783505 561% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 32.9175257732 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 937.175257732 212% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 384.0 206.0 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1640625 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69584334547 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 127.690721649 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494791666667 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 290.88556701 217% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5361174654 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.15 76.5299724578 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 4.34317383033 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 7.41237113402 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171458734794 0.216113520407 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554172595947 0.0766984524023 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595349752154 0.0603063233224 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113892392979 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208989026694 0.0580467560999 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 8.37731958763 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 8.71597938144 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 41.2886597938 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.