The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The above images illustrate a park whose name is Grange in two various time period, during it was opened firstly to the public and then in current days.
Overall, it is clear that only three facilities have been remained exactly the same, but seats were located in diverse positions have been destroyed and also some extractions have been added.
In 1920 when the park was opened for the first time, it had two entrances to the north and south of the center of it. In the middle, there was a fountain and a stage for musicians was constructed to its left. Beside the Eldon entrance, there was a glasshouse and seats to its right. Another seats as well as a rose garden were constructed to the left the bottom entrance. Beside the left wall, there were two seats at both corners. At the top, rose garden and another seats were located to the left of the Arnold entrance. Moreover, to the right, a rose garden and pond for water plants were placed, too.
Nowadays, although some features remain the same such as two entrances and the rose garden on the left top, all seats were demolished as well as other rose garden on the opposite position of the present one. Stage for musicians have been replaced to an amphitheater for concerts. Similarity, instead of fountain, rose garden with seats all of its angles have been created. A water feature is added in location of old glasshouse that has an entrance underground car park to its right. Finally, one children’s play area and a café are situated on the right top.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, so, then, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63333333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4010771474 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503703703704 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6110475612 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3571428571 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116924313268 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443475470851 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853498726098 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869283126011 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674178211442 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.