The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The plans illustrate a park whose name is Grange, firstly when it was opened for the first time in 1920 and then its looks in current days.
Overall, although some amenities have still been remained such as two entrances on top and bottom, other services have been substituted with different ones.
In the first map, a fountain was placed on the center of the park and to its left was a stage for musicians. Below this stage there was a rose garden between two seats area which the structure was exactly the same for the top corner. On the top right, there were pond for water plans as well as a rose garden. In front of those facilities, a glasshouse was located which was near to the seats on its right.
Nowadays, although all the seats were destroyed from the park, other services have been altered to new ones. Such as old fountain which has been replaced to a rose garden and 4 seats around it. Similarity, stage has been transformed to an Amphitheatre for concerts. One café and a children’s play area have been situated instead of old rose garden and play area on the top right. Finally, a water feature which has access to an entrance to underground car park has located in the location of ancient glasshouse.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, so, still, then, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57727272727 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43891911434 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518181818182 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6827433462 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5454545455 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15412924855 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637850528322 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964250292715 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120808367913 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130189808735 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.