Police budget 2017-2018 and how the money was spent
The table shows the funding for police activities in a part of Britain while the way it could be used was displayed by the charts during 2017 to 2018. Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage and million dollars. At first glance, it was evident that the highest increase occured in local taxes whereas other sources were remain constant and the fee of technology was rise quite significant.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the table’s data, the upper number of rising reached by local taxes, it was around 11 million dollars, started from 91,2 to 102,3 million dollars. Next, the budget of national government rose slightly, approximately 2 million dollars whereas other sources such as grants were almost same, about 38 million dollars over the time and all of the subjects brought to the final amount 318,6 million dollars in 2018 which was increasing about 14 million dollars from the last year.
Turning to the data in charts, the technology gained the biggest growth from under one in ten to 14% whilst the funding for making buildings and transport was identic in 3% below a fifth. However, the money spending for salaries was dropping to less than seven in ten.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...hough, it is measured in percentage and million dollars. At first glance, it was eviden...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... local taxes whereas other sources were remain constant and the fee of technology was ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ut 38 million dollars over the time and all of the subjects brought to the final amount 31...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 14 million dollars from the last year. Turning to the data in charts, the techn...
^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was dropping to less than seven in ten.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92610837438 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47830744942 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645320197044 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.581045841 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.857142857 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181203281631 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782180036001 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610605790236 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11661522853 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458287267029 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.