The process show how plants create food.
The illustration shows the process by which plants are also to produce food.
Plants required input from four different sources to produce the sugars that are needed. First roots observe the water. Added to this the plant converted the sunlight into the energy needed for the process to be able to take place .Additionaly carbon dioxide taken from the atmosphere through the leaves. Finally come the minerals which extracted from soil through the roots when combined these four factor which allowed to produce sugar which is then converted into starch and stored in leaves and stem until required when it is used for growth and repair damage of leaves stems and roots.aA byproduct of this process is convension of carbon dioxide to oxygen which is released in the atmosphere.
Overall, all the process of this are required for element to produce the food and this it is two produce different effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...for the process to be able to take place .Additionaly carbon dioxide taken from th...
^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionaly
...r the process to be able to take place .Additionaly carbon dioxide taken from the atmospher...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...from the atmosphere through the leaves. Finally come the minerals which extracted from...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e atmosphere through the leaves. Finally come the minerals which extracted from s...
^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'producing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: producing
...ombined these four factor which allowed to produce sugar which is then converted into star...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97350993377 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30688023461 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 118.814163952 43.030603864 276% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.166666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176158240415 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119355690538 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136001095608 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199852860464 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149982597472 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.