Recycling proportion from 1982 to 2010
Materials like paper, cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics had been recycling from long back in this particular country. Though recycling of papers, cardboards and glass containers was existing before 1982, the recycling of aluminium cans began in 1982 and that of plastics started in 1986. All the time, the most recycled materials are papers and cardboards. Glass containers are second in percentage of the materials that were recycled. Plastics were least recycled.
The percentage of plastics having been recycled has shown an increasing nature from the time the recycling have started. The percentage has increased to 10% in a span of 24 years. Recycling of aluminium cans increased by a good proportion. It was only 5% in 1982, which became 45% in 2010.
Earlier when the recycling of plastics and aluminium cans was nill or little the percentage of glass containers being recycled was near 50%. The percentage showed a reducing nature till 1986 and became 40%. However, it started increasing after 1986 and reached 60% by 2010. The percentage of papers and cardboards being recycled had been more than 60% in the period of 1982 to 2010. It was increasing before 1982 when the recycling of plastics and aluminium cans were not started. It reduced in the period of 1982 to 1986. There was a rise of 15% in 4 years after 1986. But, it started decreasing from 1990.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01293103448 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67724466037 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443965517241 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1248915315 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4117647059 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6470588235 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.17647058824 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306657118617 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105207507942 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814728201532 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24057534961 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029300862958 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.