Riverdale Public School System
The bar charts illustrate the change of spending per pupil and students percentage that passed the Reading and Math test at Riverside Public School system, between the years of 1995 and 2010 by 5 years difference.
Overall, the cost per pupil decreased significantly over the years. However, the second graph presents a slight decrease in the students’ results as well.
It is obvious that the highest spending per child was $ 12,000 in 1995. After that year, spending followed an almost constant decrease to the year 2010 when it was named as nearly $ 8,000 per student. During this time zone, the most remarkable difference was between the years of 1995 and 2000. At rest, the gap was significantly similar.
On the other hand, unlike spending, students' success rates were not decreased dramatically. In 1995, it was above 86% and became just less than 83% in 2010. The severe decline of spending of a child could not reflect the same fall to the percentage of success. From 1990 to 2010, the rate of successful students in Math and Reading, decreased by only 4%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-10 | Dusseldo | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | elizabeth.queijo | 42 | view |
- Riverdala Public School System 11
- The Bricks Manufacturing Process 78
- Household Budget Allocations 79
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things This has made our lives generally more comfortable but many traditional values and customs have been lost and this is a pity To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Riverdale Public School System 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$12'.
Suggestion: $12
...that the highest spending per child was $ 12,000 in 1995. After that year, spending ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$8'.
Suggestion: $8
...e year 2010 when it was named as nearly $ 8,000 per student. During this time zone,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90607734807 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5767446531 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629834254144 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8184713366 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7272727273 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0576520268748 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0175690572566 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555582372729 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483149074557 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836838744763 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.