Sales companies should recruit people who are hungry for money as they will make the most dedicated workers. Do you think money is the driving force behind hard work? What factors should be taken into consideration when recruiting staff for sales positions?
Some sales corporations ought to employ people who need to earn plenty of money made them dedicate themselves to their job. In my opinion, I believe that money is an important role behind selecting hard work, and I also believe that there are various reasons for chairmen in sales companies consider recruiting people for sales positions.
There are several certain causes to explain why money is a key behind hard work. In contemporary societies, such as some job positions are replaced by robots, so this trend leads people to lack jobs and unemployment. As a result, it is difficult to find a good job and salary, and they can have to suffer from under pressure on the money when they live in the development of the economy period. The second reason is that some countries can not find a senior position for poor people, especially poor Indians. As consequently, poor Indians have to do hard work earned a salary; however, they just have a low amount of money in their job, this leads them to do more hard works than richer people.
The first factor is that the sales positions cannot adopt with some people. For instance, some people are likely to be easily angry rather than others. As a result, angry people cannot control their emotions, so this can make customers feeling unpleasant. Another good example of this is that some workers have good communication skill, they could be chosen by seniors in companies. As a result, some businesses need people who have experience with communication skills with consumers, this is a benefit for the employee when they want to work in this place.
In conclusion, some businesses think that they recruit people who lack money, this can make workers devoted themself in their companies. In my view, I think that if people have not enough money to pay for other activities in their life, and then they are more likely to do hard work to find a good salary than others, I also agree that senior positions ought to consider some main factors when they recruit people for sales positions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, then, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 5.60731707317 678% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 965.302439024 175% => OK
No of words: 352.0 196.424390244 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78693181818 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50111029064 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480113636364 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 283.868780488 185% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2872633188 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332300741244 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126424682352 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814688715339 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240216470433 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837783671927 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.