It is a contradictory notion of folks whether it is best to accept a worst situation or efforts to enhance such situations. This essay would argue both views. However, in my opinion, improvement is an imperative to remove the worst situation instead of compromising with bad situations.
From the perspective of some people, every fragments of life are not same as we thought. In that cases, people have to accept the truth and keep going-on with the flow in the hope of enriching the situations. Despite the mismatching with academic, people involve in non-academic professions because of paltry vacancies in their field. Consequently, they forced themselves even if they are neither interested nor satisfied with the job in order to accomplish their desire. For instance, a recent survey reveals, employees remain in same organization instead of changing their occupation just because of hope to improve the situation.
On the flip side, some people argue that it is good to try best in order to improve the situation rather than stuck in worst situation. If we feel difficult to conduct our life conveniently, we shall boost income by part-time jobs. In addition, whenever we personally try to solve the problem, the result somehow come with positive attitude and possible to handled only if we focus to lightening the impact of situation. For example, to defeat the strong opposition leader , another leader must be able to woo the voters by improving the situation where the rival leader lacks.
To sum up, it is not always bad to accept the worst situation, who knows future might be bright, if individual followed contineously. So, by evaluating properly, individuals have to make decision in order to make favourable situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...n of folks whether it is best to accept a worst situation or efforts to enhance s...
^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the worst'.
Suggestion: in the worst
...improve the situation rather than stuck in worst situation. If we feel difficult to cond...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., to defeat the strong opposition leader , another leader must be able to woo the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11971830986 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91947114873 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595070422535 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 283.868780488 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4464960417 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21037065961 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676000875394 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567524080427 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120182524305 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604636458673 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.