The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.Summarise the information by selecting and r

The charts reveal the outcomes of a survey of an adult education. The purpose of youth to study is shown by first bar graph whereas second pie chart illustrates how the expenses is managed for these courses.
Overall, majority of students decided to take part in adult eduction due to their interest for subjects and to pay, each individual student have to share much more money from their side instead of other sector.
First of all, students who are tantamount to 40% are encourage to study as a result of their interest which is followed by 38% pupils, who wanted to achieve qualification. Similarly, approximately one fifth of whole students decided to study just because of perspective of promotion, to assist their recent jobs and take learning as a tool of enjoyment. Additionally, scanty of 12% and 9% youth enrolled just to take advantages while changing jobs and to visit people.
Individual have to pay 40% of total cost who wanted to participate in any course. On the other hand, remaining 60% fees is paid not only by taxpayer but also by employer whose contribution are 25% and 35% respectively.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
... students who are tantamount to 40% are encourage to study as a result of their interest ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'studying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: studying
...who are tantamount to 40% are encourage to study as a result of their interest which is ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85789473684 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7770378208 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636842105263 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4837001001 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.125 5.23603664747 251% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135499509124 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067161380039 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923072220989 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867356051624 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949887620969 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.