Skilled and knowledgeable employees who hail from underdeveloped countries should offer jobs by affluent countries. The given topic is highly controvertible since different people may have different notion. However, in my opinion, working for overseas countries for a life long period, have detrimental effects to their own native country. So, I partially consonant with this statement.
The underdeveloped and developing nations cannot affort jobs for their entire youth, even though they have qualification and eligibility for the posts. Consequently, unemployment rate of the poor country's will rise. Rich country can assist them by providing technical supports as well as recruiting employees from countries which are facing the problem of poverty. This type of development will be benificial not only for the poor country but boost the economic of rich country as well. By the same token, workers from poor countries are able to accomplish work experience and enrich skills which would be advantages for the future. For example, the folks who works for abroad country can implement skills, after returning back.
On the other hand, some people assert that sometimes, working for foreign country becomes great losses for poor country. They believed that after sending such skilled and talented candidate, who will run the country, if they didn't return to their motherland. Because of scanty number of intelligent and educated people remained, their problems will rise significantly. For instance, a survey shows that poor country has to face many social and economic problem in long term just because of working in abroad.
To sum up, if people from the poor country who are skilled and knowledgeable return to their native country after few years of working experience, will be benificial for both countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 713, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...oad country can implement skills, after returning back. On the other hand, some people asse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...date, who will run the country, if they didnt return to their motherland. Because of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42756183746 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81583097756 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4334462728 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355274996418 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129741124346 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110583941565 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240698127244 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632335383018 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.