Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate between people about public health. Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required to improve health of public. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by supporting those proponents who say that public health should be improved by sports facilities along with other measures.
There are several solid reasons why the public needs other sources along with sports facilities to improve their health. One of them is that public should take care of their health by visiting doctors once in a month and follow their routine checkup. It can also be argued that daily exercises also show the positive impact in public health. It should also be taken into account that public should eat their meal at right time without delaying especially urban area's people. Because urban area's public have more health problem than rural area only because of untimely meal.
As per a recent survey it has been found that approximately sixty five percent of India's urban area's population are suffering from many diseases all because of untimely meal.
Taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I am inclined to believe that people need other sources along with sports facilities to improve their health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...tely sixty five percent of Indias urban areas population are suffering from many dise...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07053941909 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34821046506 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580912863071 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4482049361 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448078083274 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203772120976 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197894194048 0.0843802449381 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241372473371 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.247629434984 0.0819641961636 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.