Nowadays there is an going debate people about a moot question that the companies should or should not take their employees' suggestions and ideas to perform well? While it is possible to claim that companies should adapt the ideas of their employees to perform well in this competitive era, my view is that advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view after analysing both sides of the argument.
There are several solid reasons why the companies of this modern era need to adapt the ideas and suggestion their of employees to thrive the thrive the competitive environment. One of them is that the people who working in the particular area knows the ins and outs of the processes involved to perform that job. He is in the best person to come out with
ideas which can provide a higher output for the organisation in that particular area. For this reason, in many manufacturing houses labourers are given incentives for each new idea they come up with. Such companies value the thoughts of each and every employee. It should also be taken into account that lower level authorities can deal and communicate with the customer in better way than top level authorities. For instance, a salesman can crack a deal with customer nicely and even also he complete his work in time with given target.
Those who argue for that the companies should not take the ideas and suggestion of employees to perform well have a different view and say that it can actually be a good thing. It is claimed that it should be the duty of only the higher management to come up with innovations and decisions. Then, there are concerns about management has a belief that taking ideas and suggestion from everybody would only lead to chaos. Employees may provide suggestion having a personal interest, which could be harmful to the company.
While there are strong arguments on both the sides of the case, my personal opinion is that the organization can only
flourish well where its employees are given the freedom to innovate and rewarded for the same. Top level management should be smart enough to judge its plausibility of implementation, as the final decision has to be taken by them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Nowadays there is an going debate people about a moot questi...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'thrive the'.
Suggestion: thrive the
...as and suggestion their of employees to thrive the thrive the competitive environment. One of them is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...suggestion their of employees to thrive the thrive the competitive environment. One of the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al with customer nicely and even also he complete his work in time with given tar...
^^
Line 8, column 68, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ments on both the sides of the case, my personal opinion is that the organization can only flou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, so, then, well, while, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 5.94088669951 286% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 380.0 242.827586207 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83157894737 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 3.92707691288 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65228694503 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492105263158 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4478282915 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330917672399 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106670238791 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101812668407 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149604467929 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106280256794 0.0609392437508 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 64.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.