Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A school of thought holds that undergraduate students should focus on advantageous subjects such as science and technology, while the alternative stance asserts that they should study the subject in which they are passionate. The purpose of this essay is to discuss both sides of this contentious argument and then explain why I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, proponents of studying subjects related to science and technology tend to point out a combination of reasons. First and foremost, science and technology have progressed significantly and impacted our daily life top to bottom, so we cannot deny the blessings. To illustrate, computers and the Internet have changed the world in every aspect, such as communication and cooperation. Another compelling reason is that students who learn these disciplines will have a more promising future. For instance, people who work in the IT industry may have a higher salary than writers.
On the other hand, I advocate those who believe that university students should study subjects they like. The primary reason is that students who choose their subjects as their interests will deliver remarkable results. One such example of this is that Taylor Swift, a world-famous music director, and singer, studied music as a major. Furthermore, the pupils will be less stressed and more fun when they learn their favorite field, and then they could focus their efforts to get their targets. Therefore, I think people are more likely to succeed if they follow their interests.
In conclusion, I believe that both sides are justifiable. However, on balance, although studying science and technology subjects is helpful for all university students in the future, they should be encouraged to learn whatever they like for achieving their goals in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...uture. For instance, people who work in the IT industry may have a higher salary than ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 5.60731707317 606% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.276816609 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79329853978 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 283.868780488 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8118515665 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440699117564 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135077053444 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121365971098 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261902601691 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08706998825 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 40.7170731707 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.