The linear graphs illustrate the number of people penalize for driving too fast and the number of people murdered in such accidents in Britain while the table shows public review on a survey of speed cameras.
In the initial year when cameras are installed around 2 lac people been caught and these figures gradually increased by one lac in every year up to a 5th year. However, after the 6th year of camera installation, the ratio has rapidly grown up and reached to 16 lac in the 8th year. On the other hand, the killing ratio was 3100 in the first year and reached around 3400 in 3rd year. After this, the figures dropped by 3000 in the 4th year and shows fluctuation throughout the last year and touched again the similar figure of 2nd year.
However, 32% of people believe in the reduction of accidents by cameras, while 60% of people denied it and the remaining 8% have no idea. Furthermore, 26% of citizens think that speed cameras are installed to improve road safety, whereas, 71% gave reason to raise revenue and a very minor group of people do not know the reason. Another review on the number of speed cameras on the road, where 56% says too many, 19% says too few, however, 17% says about right and remaining 8% not aware of it.
Overall, it is clear to see that as speed cameras are installed the number of drivers pay more fines, while from a survey it shows that a large number of people believe it useless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ines, while from a survey it shows that a large number of people believe it useless.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge number of people believe it useless.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51153846154 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24181284947 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.0709090903 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165380954647 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669769024041 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489737301387 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105348136876 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533274253625 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.