Even though many developments have been taken place in the field of agriculture, the problems related to hunger has not been eradicated completely. There are a variety of possible reasons for this; however, steps can definitely be taken to tackle the problem.
To commence with, there are myriad reasons behind this issue. One of the most prominent reasons is the overstaking. Wealthy businessmen stock the large amount of stock in their godowns in order to create a shortage of food in the market. When the food of the price is increased, they sell their stocks at higher price in order to get high profit. Hence, people who live below poverty line are not able to buy food at such high prices. Another point to consider is that the lack of infrastructure. For example, in India, after green revolution there is not a problem for food shortage. However, due to poor road conditions food can not be reached on time to people who are living in remote areas. Similarly, due to lack of cold storage food items can not be stored for long time and it leads to the wastage of food.
There are plethora of ways which can be implemented by government to eradicate this problem. First of all, government should impose stringent laws against the overstaking of food. Thus, it would help to prevent from man made price fluctuations. Apart from that, states should run the public awareness program to make the people aware about the importance of the food and motivate them not to waste food products. Lastly, authorities should give the boost in creating the infrastructure for storing the food for long time and connect the remote areas with all weather roads to ensure that food will come on time.
In conclusion, overstocking and poor infrastructure are the prime reason for hunger, but it can be eradicated by implementing stringent laws and boosting infrastructure.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, lastly, similarly, so, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89589905363 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72076486937 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 106.607317073 167% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 283.868780488 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.660038789 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137703150969 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501515152419 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579168199309 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929401691953 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330566640237 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.