summarise the information and report main features and make comparison
The bar chart illustrates the percentages of the population’s coffee and tea consumption habits in five different Australian cities.
It is immediately obvious that people in all four cities showed their preference for going to a café the most except in Aldelaide and the proportion of residents who bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks is the lowest in all five cities.
As can be seen from the chart that the percentages of people went to a café for coffee or tea in Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart is over 60% while that percentage in Brisbane is 55% and in Adelaide is under a half, even lower than the percentage of people bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks. Especially, the proportions of people went to a café always nearly double higher than the proportions of the population who bought fresh coffee in all cities.
People rarely bought fresh coffee, that is the reason why the proportion of city residents bought fresh coffee in five cities is the lowest, all around 34% to 44%. Morever, there is no big different between the percentages of people bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks in five cities, all about 45% to 55%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
It is true that advertising is really develop nowadays. Although it can be argued tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04844290657 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96453981358 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525951557093 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9449833116 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.214285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267783210629 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09723741782 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064204252944 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171675268238 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447669672971 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.