The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
This report derives from a table and a pie chart illustrating the origins and issued sectors of a police budget in a specific area of Britain in 2017 and 2018.
Generally speaking, The principal origin of presented police allocation came from the national government while the major proportion of it was utilized for the salaries.
Turning to the table, National government accounted for the lion share of the allotment in both years(175.5m and 177.8m respectively) followed by local taxes as the second-highest contributors. However, in 2018, the offerings of native tariff exhibited a growth of about 11m pounds while the total allocation also increased approximately by 14m pounds compared to the previous year. In terms of offerings from other sources remained almost equal around 38m pounds.
Looking at the pie chart, the investment on buildings and transportation of police forces stayed constant in both years. Moreover, In 2018 the spending on technology was almost doubled than the previous one ( around 14% and 8% respectively). Even though, the expenses on salaries decreased by 6% from the last year, this section still remained responsible for the highest consumption of the allotment (around 69% and 75% respectively).
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was almost doubled than the previous one around 14% and 8% respectively. Even tho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37113402062 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0098149573 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623711340206 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5630571273 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223522033352 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898632882926 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928877201046 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1490237742 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103223479528 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was almost doubled than the previous one around 14% and 8% respectively. Even tho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37113402062 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0098149573 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623711340206 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5630571273 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223522033352 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898632882926 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928877201046 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1490237742 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103223479528 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.