The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalilites and areas.
The table and chart compare the Australian population in term of nationalities and different areas.
Overall, it is clear that Australian natives accounted for the highest proportion compared to other nationalities. Moreover, most residents inclined to live in urban areas than in countryside.
According to the pie chart, Australian figure dominated the first place in the ranking with 73%. In contrast, while british accounted for only 7% of the whole population, less than 3% of people came from New Zealand, China and Netherlands . Likewise, about 14% of residents migrated from other nations.
In term of the urban proportion, the trend was totally different. In addition, 99% of chinese people spent time living in sprawling cities, making up the highest proportion . Followed by New Zealander and British, both nationalities accounted for the significant proportion, at 90% and 89% each. Moreover, while the figure for Dutch was around 83%, Australian proportion took the lowest position in the ranking with only 80%. However, referring to the countryside area, Australia was the nation which made up the highest percentage, at 20%. In contrast, only 1% of chinese residents decided to live in rural areas
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... from New Zealand, China and Netherlands . Likewise, about 14% of residents migrat...
^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cities, making up the highest proportion . Followed by New Zealander and British, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, moreover, while, as to, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95141135612 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2019620048 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14029892821 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531478754548 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724985291749 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106937880188 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823166068558 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.