The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in Millions in three different cities.
The given table demonstrates the actual population (measured in millions) in three distinct cities (namely Sao Paulo, Jakarta, and Shanghai) in 1990 and 2000, as well as anticipated figures in 2000.
Overall, it is evident from the statistics that while Sao Paulo and Jakarta experienced an upward trend in the overall population, the opposite is true for Shanghai. Furthermore, there seems to be a significant disparity between predicted numbers and those in reality.
In 1990, the population of Sao Paulo was reported to be 15 million people, ranking first among other provided regions. This was followed by Shanghai (13,5 million), and Jakarta with slightly below 10 million citizens.
By 2000, Sao Paulo’s and Jakarta’s populations had been expected to rise to 24 and 14 million respectively, but the figures turned out to be just 18 million for the former and 11,5 million for the latter. It is also noticeable that contrary to speculation which is a rising trend for Shanghai’s population, the figure went downward instead, registering at 12,5 million people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2514619883 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89887470812 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9061146968 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305710169782 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127893546567 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818195662351 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173294302246 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818701671512 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.