The table below describes the proportion of smokers in males and females (between the age of 15 and 20) in Britain.
The table illustrates the percentage of men and women who smoked during 30 years from 1970 to 2000 in the United Kingdom. As can be seen from the table, the figure for male and female smokers increased much and there were more men than women during the period surveyed.
In 1970, the proportion of men who smoked was 2 times as much as that of women, at 10% and 5% respectively. The figure for male smokers rose steadily and hit the greatest peak at 37% in 1985. Then, it saw a slight decline during the last decade, from 36% in 1990 to 28% in 2000.
The number of female smokers was at the lowest in 1970, then it grew significantly to the highest point at 37%, which was 1% higher than that of male smokers in 1990. In 1995, the gap between 2 sexual groups continued to increase 1% despite the 5% decrease of the former, at 34%. However, the proportion of female smokers was slightly 1% lower than that of its counterparts, at 27%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-05 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 65 | view |
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which the goods are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- Topic: The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The two maps show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41954022989 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61428563178 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0465572754 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167726085166 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746373119457 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468396104455 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112897650797 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354580175241 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.