The table below gives information about the amount of beef exported in five different countries in 2012, 2014 and 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table represents data about beef exports of five countries in the years 2012, 2014 and 2016.
Overall, it is evident that Brazil and Uruguay were the clear market leaders throughout the period. However, Japan experienced the most remarkable rise in beef exports.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that Brazil's beef exports grew from 125 thousand to 137 thousand tonnes within four years, keeping its lead among the five countries. Maintaining its second place, Uruguay saw the amount of beef shipped to other countries dip to under 40 thousand tonnes in 2014, before rebounding two years later.
With a nearly fivefold increase, Japan witnessed the most dramatic increase in its beef export quantities, reaching a peak of over 1000 tonnes in 2016. Similar to Uruguay, Switzerland saw its beef exports falling slightly to only 17 tonnes in 2014, before rising to 22 tonnes in 2016. The opposite trend was experienced by Norway: beef exports surged to 81 tonnes in 2014, before decreasing substantially to a mere 17 tonnes at the end of the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06741573034 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52604161718 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4090563901 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192396157644 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100459280737 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101434294366 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151535673701 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124023213849 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.