The given table chart elucidates the information about the distance travelled per person per year by different modes of travel in England between years 1985 and 2000.
A closer look at illustration reveals that, the distance travelled by walking in year 1985 was higher as compared to year 2000. Precisely, distance covered by using bycycle was least in both year which attributed to 51 miles and 41 miles. Along with this, major difference could be seen in distance travelled by using car between year 1985 and 2000. Further, maximum distance was travelled by using local bus as compared to long distance bus.
Furthermore, average distance travelled per person in a train constituted to 289 miles in 1985 and 366 miles in 2000. Moreover, minimum distance covered by using taxi was 13 miles and 42 miles in both years. Lastly, around 130 miles of difference could be seen in other modes of travel.
Overall, I conclude that highest distance travelled by using car in both years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...lled by walking in year 1985 was higher as compared to year 2000. Precisely, dista...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, lastly, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99393939394 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54174332631 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1835873576 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234036485114 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111713034838 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11903683078 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172427614623 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140263509021 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.