The table shows the proportions of money consumers spent on different items in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002. In general, invidual in five countries spent the most money in Food/Drinks/Tobacco while the percentage of Leisure/Education was by far the lowest in 2002.
It is clear from the table that the propotion of money Turkish spent on Food/Drinks/Tobacco was 32,14%. There were slightly less money in Ireland than Turkey, at 28,91%. The percentages of money Spainish, Italian, Swidish spent on this item stood at between 15% and 19%.
On the other hand, Italian spent the most money in Clothing/Footwear while Swedish spent the least. The proportions of money people in the other coutries spent on this item were approximately 6.5%. Futhermore, Turkish spent about 4.5% which twice as much money as Spanish in Leisure/Education whereas Italian spent the similar amount of money as Swedish.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26712328767 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32344266655 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554794520548 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2892365042 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124262911582 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647075438344 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827235973319 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106976998892 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10106173372 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.