The table below gives information about the percentage of adults who paid for admission to various entertainment events in five nations.
The given table represents data on purchases of four entertainment types in North America and Europe in 2012.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that cinema was the most characteristics mode of entertainment among people of five given countries. Museums and galleries were the least famous for North America and sports for Europe.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that in terms of performing arts maximum attendance had been calculated by France and UK about 39 percents and 41.4 percents respectively. Whereas, over half of the Canadian and USA bought the ticket of cinema. Museums and galleries were mostly famous in France just 37.6percents. Sports was the best entertainment source for the United Kingdom.
Shifting to the remaining data, only 31.9percents individuals of Canada paid for performing arts as compared to 44.7percents for cinema. Individuals of North America had no interest in museum and galleries. The presence of France was accounted as low in the sports just 22.7percents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'characteristics'' or 'characteristic's'?
Suggestion: characteristics'; characteristic's
...adily apparent that cinema was the most characteristics mode of entertainment among people of f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28395061728 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97740820342 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 162.0 22.4926829268 720% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 856.0 112.824112599 759% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 162.0 22.9334400587 706% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.0 5.23603664747 401% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11979813551 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11979813551 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768734814132 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016390690101 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 84.4 13.2329268293 638% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -92.95 61.2550243902 -152% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.5 10.3012195122 646% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.53 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.96 8.06136585366 198% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 66.8 10.9970731707 607% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 67.0 11.0658536585 605% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.