The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table shows the proportion of land covered by forest in four countries in 1990 and 2005 as well as projected figures for 2015.
It is noticeble that Brazil had the largest proportion of land in three years. However, Brazil and Australia experienced a decrease whereas New Zealand and Chile had an upward trend in the figures for forested land over the period shown.
Out of the four countries, the percentage of forested land was noticeably higher in Brazil, at 62.2% and New Zealand, at 28.8% in 1990. The figures for land covered by forest was also higher in Brazil in 2005 as well as projected in 2015, but it rapidly declined by 10% in total, at 53.5% for 2015. By contrast, forested land in New Zealand see an increase to 31% in 2005 and estimated in 2015, at 32.3%.
Nearly 22% of land covered by forest in Australia was bigger than that in Chile, with 20.4% in 1990. And, Australia merely decreased whereas Chile inclined slightly, with 21.3% and 21.5% of forested land respectively in 2005. We can also see a continuous trend estimated figures for 2015, at 20% in Australia and 22% in Chile.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | nle2006 | 74 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | kavi jk | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-10 | Bella.pham | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | Huyen My | 41 | view |
| 2017-10-24 | thefirst25 | 83 | view |
- Many people are optimistic about the 21st century and see it as an opportunity to make positive changes to the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with their optimism What changes would you like to see in the new century 73
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 67
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than those in the past which reduces their activity levels accordingly Why is this the case What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children 90
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67857142857 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47672947244 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479591836735 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5036685092 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272631353 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137349679862 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782080691893 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196733677806 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832706992013 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.