The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
A breakdown of educational obstacles experienced in two different schools from 2005 to 2015 is presented in the table.
In 2005, 42% pupil faced the difficulties to follow teacher instructions in school A whereas a very small percentage of those had the same issues in school B. In ranks of 30 and 40 of students attending in the former school experienced problems of spelling and listening skills as well as verbal expressions of ideas and concentration in lessons while the equivalent problems in the latter one ranged from 5 to 15. Only a few pupils suffered from reading and writing abilities. Decreasing significantly for percentage in school A, but those number of students had a problem more than to school B.
By 2015, the proportion of children in school A facing the difficulties following instruction fell by 24%, and this school had seen saw by 5% and 15% as well as 14% and 22% in the figures for those facing problems in spelling and listening skills as well as verbal expressions and concentration. This had contrasted to the proportion in school B showing that significant rises in children struggling from falling the instruction and spelling to 12% and 10% subsequently. There had been slight changes in the percentages of other problems.
To sum up, problems faced by situations students in school A could be managed while overall rises towards problems in school B were seen. Although school A minimizes the learning obstacles, its proportions were still higher than school B.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperienced in two different schools from 2005 to 2015 is presented in the table. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well, whereas, while, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.032 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03569168395 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0794700313 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259657900552 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107558632069 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683751256596 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174647553133 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110625734608 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.