The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table represents data about average sales of a restaurant in three places (Georgia, Dunsmuir and Drake Street) in the year 2016. This report will evaluate the data given.
Overall, the highest sales of the restaurant were on the branch of Georgia street whereas the least profitable branch was of Drake Street. However, the transaction value of this branch was relatively higher than that of the Dunsmuir branch.
It is certain that most sales took place in the branch of Georgia street where the highest number of transactions and transaction value was 854 and $10.69 respectively. Similarly, the restaurant also benefitted a lot from the Dunsmuir branch where the number of transactions was 750 but their value was $5 less than that of Georgia Branch.
While both the branch had a much higher number of transactions, the restaurant branch at Drake Street had only 390 transactions including 200 eat-in transactions and 190 take-away transactions. But, the transaction value at the same branch, surprisingly, was over $9. In terms of food, Chicken Burger was the best-selling food at the Georgia branch and for the Dunsmuir branch, it was the Chicken wings whereas the last branch was famous for its Chicken Pasta.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...transactions was 750 but their value was less than that of Georgia Branch. Wh...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f transactions, the restaurant branch at Drake Street had only 390 transactions i...
^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the same branch, surprisingly, was over . In terms of food, Chicken Burger was th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77009793867 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489898989899 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4206992572 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150141477702 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817338687955 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548294676979 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119573687312 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499045319523 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.