The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below illustrates the statistics about sales record, compared with three different branches in 2016, showing the number of transactions, transaction value, number of eat-in and take-away and the most popular item.
Overall, the Vancouver Georgia Street was the busiest, and having the highest bill cost per transaction. Meanwhile, the two remaining branches also had some interesting numbers and facts.
The number of transactions at the Georgia branch was 854. Despite the high cost, it still saw a fantastic amount of eat-in and take-away transactions. Compared with the Drake branch, the number of bills was 2 times higher, although share a familiar value of each transactions. The remaining one at Dunsmuir got the relatively fine amount of 750, but it was not as profitable as the two others due to the low value of the bill cost.
At these restaurants, we can clearly see customers preference. They had a trend of taking food away, rather having it at the restaurant itself, except the third branch. With the number of 200 and 190 for eat-in and take-away, the ratio was kind of the same for the Vancouver Drake Street branch. For the other two, there was a huge leap, around 35 to 50 transactions. Also, three branches had three different types of favourite item; and it was chicken burger at the first one, the chicken wings for the Dunsmuir, and the chicken pasta for the last branch.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, third, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96202531646 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68386273089 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565400843882 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8844300366 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0974350085719 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359517874638 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457850052647 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700882508923 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549196670123 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.