The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below illustrates the margin of students' choice of school types, divided by four school models between 2000 to 2009.
It is clear in the table that the amount of students attended voluntary-controlled schools was the highest at 2000 and 2005, while community schools captured the highest at 2009.
In detail, the number of students applied for voluntary schools was 52% at 2000. However, the following years saw a sharp drop, with a loss of nearly one-third in just 10 years. On the other hand, community schools experienced a significantly contrast trend. From 12% at 2000 to 58% at 2009, the share itself skyrocketed almost 5 times higher.
To the other types of school, both of them saw some minor fluctuations. Schools for specialist always ranked as the least favorable type, with a rate of decrease was 1% every 5 years. The last type of school though, suffered some small loss of attendees, with 19% at 2005 to 12% at 2009, while the percentage at 200 was 24%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('contrast') instead of another adjective.
...her hand, community schools experienced a significantly contrast trend. From 12% at 2000 to 58% at 2009,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84023668639 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77136669764 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.182994306 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174184202798 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776656620697 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586977225145 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129353158635 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538438654597 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.