The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following tables illustrate the total revenue gained from Fairtrade's coffee and bananas at the year of 1999 and 2004, divided by six countries.
Overall, the sale of coffee and bananas at the UK in both 1999 and 2004 captured the highest margin, while Sweden had the lowest sales of coffee at 1999 and bananas at 2004.
The UK had the sale rate of coffee at 1999 was 1.5 million euros. Compared to other countries, it was ranked at the middle. At 2004, however, this number got skyrocketed, nearly 20 times bigger. To the country of Switzerland, it only had the profit of 6 million euros. With Denmark, Belgium and Sweden though, they all shared the same trend of slow increase in terms of revenue. The speed of rise at these countries only oscillated around 0.2 to 0.7 million euros in a period of 5 years.
At banana, Uk still dominated the chart with two-digit numbers, with 15 and 47 million of euros at 1999 and 2004, respectively. Even though, Switzerland was the country that got the highest velocity of growth, nearly 6 times higher from 1999 to 2004. On the other hand, Belgium and Sweden experienced some heavy fluctuations, with Belgium went down from 1.8 to 1 millions, and Sweden fell from 2 to 0.9 millions too.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68348623853 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48749502763 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8478702736 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145429155808 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615981836489 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697689053979 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12540242288 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686086588474 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.