The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables represent sale figures of two Fairtrade-labelled products in five countries in the years 1999 and 2004.
Overall, it is evident that Fairtrade coffee sales rose between the five years in every surveyed country. The majority of the nations also witnessed a rise in the consumption of Fairtrade-labelled bananas.
Looking at the first table more closely, one can see that the UK spent more money on Fairtrade coffee compared to any of the remaining countries, while also having the most dramatic rise in sales, from 1.5 million to 20 million euros. Switzerland and Belgium also witnessed a sharp increase, from 3 million to 6 million euros for the former, and from 1 million to 1.7 million euros for the latter. Less significant were the climbs of 200 thousand euros seen in Denmark and Sweden.
As for sales of Fairtrade-labelled bananas, the UK remained the leading market, tripling in consumption to 47 million euros in 2004. Growth was also seen in Switzerland, from 1 million to 5.5 million euros, an in Denmark, from 600 thousand to 4 million euros. By contrast, both Belgium and Sweden halved in sales of Fairtrade-labelled bananas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0942408377 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14068055452 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8379799327 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140711032391 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807366649307 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730675085609 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127442402243 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723538049767 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.