The should below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two tables reveal the data regarding to the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European nations. Overall, it is conspicuous that the sales of both coffee and bananas had increased over the five year except those of bananas in Sweden and Denmark.
In terms of the sales of coffee among the five countries, the rising on earning in UK was the most dramatic from 1.5 millions of euros in 1999 to 20 millions in 2004. Followed by Switzerland, its sales doubled, starting at 3 millions and ending at 6 millions over the period. By comparison, the increasing was less significant in Belgium, only reporting 0.7 millions. However, the minimum gaps were in Denmark and Sweden (0.2 millions), and the sales at last were 2 millions and 1 millions respectively.
As to the trading patterns about bananas, things are different compared with coffee, with three nations showing increasing trends but two reporting falls. Among all countries, Switzerland always ranked at the top no matter in 1999 (15 millions of euros) or in 2004 (47 millions of euros). UK and Belgium also rose by 4.5 and 3.4 millions, and their sales were 5.5 and 4 millions separately by 2004. In contrast, the selling in Sweden and Denmark suggested decreasing tendencies, with that in Sweden dropping from 1.8 to 1 and that in Denmark falling from 2 to 0.9.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...ning in UK was the most dramatic from 1.5 millions of euros in 1999 to 20 millions in 2004. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...ays ranked at the top no matter in 1999 15 millions of euros or in 2004 47 millions of euros. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
...in 1999 15 millions of euros or in 2004 47 millions of euros. UK and Belgium also rose by 4.5 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82832618026 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78570198886 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540772532189 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0124967465 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193039256907 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869786007658 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820729232508 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154151976559 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837837499656 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.