The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the level of violent crime in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a whimsical assumption of what if everyone mimics whatever they come across in a film. It seems like a human nature for audiences to act like those characters in movies or series, so is there a certain connection between violent ingredients in films and crimes in real world? From my point of view, it is somewhat understandable for governments to lesson violence in entertainment media, yet this kind of action might not that desirable in some aspects, and let me illustrate my perspective as follows.
It is true that controlling the quantity of crimes displayed in media would reduce the incidence of crime in reality. What I’m trying to describe is that certain groups of viewers, those aggressive in particular, are possible to commit concrete crimes by simulating the detailed procedures depicted in movies or TV programs. For example, a serial killer murdered more than 30 people during the period between 1993 and 2000 and claimed that he was inspired by a violent movie. In that occasion, it is necessary that the government should restrict violence in media that contains specific details about how a crime is processed.
Nevertheless, violent ingredients should never be interfere too much by the government when it comes to the coherence of artistic expressions. Quentin Tarantino, taken into consideration, is a typical prototype of violent literature and is highly remarked by his violent films such as Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction. In other words, some violent components are indispensable in partial spheres of entertainment industry, especially those films directed by Quentin Tarantino and John Woo. And these movies would lose their unique attractions if violent elements are forced to diminish. To sum up, by no means should the government interfere the amount of violence in art forms that are determined to express violence.
In conclusion, taking measures to control the violent contents in film and television industry has both merit and demerit, and the original consideration of the government regarding to cutting down crime rate in society is appropriate too. Perhaps in the future, the government could come up with a more considerate trail in order to reduce potential crimes without disturbing any art forms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'be' and 'interfere'.
Suggestion: be never interfere
...evertheless, violent ingredients should never be interfere too much by the government when it come...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments are forced to diminish. To sum up, by no means should the government interf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, in particular, kind of, such as, in other words, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25138121547 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96602378464 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8626186978 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.785714286 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277610939467 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862297833547 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409541350864 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154429297418 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026057834892 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.