The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table reveals the proportions of expenditure spent on different categories in five European nations in 2002. Overall, it is obvious that the consumption of Food/Drinks/Tobacco sector was always the largest, while that of leisure and education was the minimum among all the five countries.
For Turkey and Ireland, their costs on intake stuff ranked number one and two compared with other countries, with 32.14% and 28.91% respectively. Additionally, they also shared similar percentages of wearing things with Turkey accounting 6.63% and Ireland taking up 6.43%. By contrast, the spending on leisure and education in Turkey (4.35%) was almost twice as that in Ireland (2.21%).
As to the rest countries, the greatest proportion of clothing and footwear was in Italy, representing 9.00% of its whole consumer expenditure, and the figures in Spain (6.51%) and Sweden (5.40%) were relatively significant. For the expenditure on leisure and education sector, Italy and Sweden reported similarities: 3.20% and 3.22% separately, while Spain represented the smallest percentage (1.98%). At last, Not mentioned are the consumptions of food, drinks and tobacco in the three countries: 18.80% in Spain, 16.36% in Italy and 15.77% in Sweden.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
... intake stuff ranked number one and two compared with other countries, with 32.14% and 2...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51322751323 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03514680406 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645502645503 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2222852041 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0664713977842 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345113425947 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552838115016 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505046722311 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463561554202 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.